Crossmark

LI-RADS 4 or 5 categorization may not be clinically relevant for decision-making processes: A prospective cohort study

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aohep.2020.06.007

Published Print: 2020-11

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1016/elsevier_cm_policy

Authors

Piñero, Federico

Thompson, Marcos A.

Diaz Telli, Federico

Trentacoste, Juan

Padín, Carlos

Mendizabal, Manuel

Colaci, Carla

Gonzalez Campaña, Ariel

Pages, Josefina

Montal, Silvina

Barreiro, Mariano

Fauda, Martín

Podestá, Gustavo

Perotti, Juan Pablo

Silva, Marcelo
License Information

Text and Data Mining valid from 2020-11-01

Text and Data Mining valid from 2020-11-01

Version of Record valid from 2020-07-03
More Information

This article is maintained by: Elsevier

Article Title: LI-RADS 4 or 5 categorization may not be clinically relevant for decision-making processes: A prospective cohort study

Journal Title: Annals of Hepatology

CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aohep.2020.06.007

Content Type: article

Copyright: © 2020 Fundación Clínica Médica Sur, A.C. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U.