Crossmark

What is most important to predict a good response of cardiac resynchronization therapy, the QRS duration or its morphology?

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rceng.2019.01.012

Published Print: 2019-06

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1016/elsevier_cm_policy

Authors

López-de-Sa, E.

Rosillo, S.O.
License Information

Text and Data Mining valid from 2019-06-01
More Information

This article is maintained by: Elsevier

Article Title: What is most important to predict a good response of cardiac resynchronization therapy, the QRS duration or its morphology?

Journal Title: Revista Clínica Española (English Edition)

CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rceng.2019.01.012

CrossRef DOI link to the associated document: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rce.2019.01.007

Content Type: simple-article

Copyright: © 2019 Elsevier España, S.L.U. and Sociedad Española de Medicina Interna (SEMI). All rights reserved.