Crossmark

Response to the letter to the editor: “Is there a real consensus among anaesthetists and surgeons about the neuromuscular block? Methodological considerations about the ACHILLES study”

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redare.2017.09.011

Published Print: 2017-12

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1016/elsevier_cm_policy

Authors

Errando, C.L.

Moreno-Sanz, C.

Vila-Caral, P.

Ruiz de Adana-Belbel, J.C.

Vázquez-Alonso, E.

Ramírez-Rodríguez, J.M.

Veiga-Ruiz, G.

Guasch-Arévalo, E.

Lora-Tamayo D’Ocón, J.I.
License Information

Text and Data Mining valid from 2017-12-01
More Information

This article is maintained by: Elsevier

Article Title: Response to the letter to the editor: “Is there a real consensus among anaesthetists and surgeons about the neuromuscular block? Methodological considerations about the ACHILLES study”

Journal Title: Revista Española de Anestesiología y Reanimación (English Edition)

CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redare.2017.09.011

CrossRef DOI link to the associated document: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redare.2017.09.010

CrossRef DOI link to the associated document: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redar.2017.05.006

Content Type: simple-article

Copyright: © 2017 Sociedad Española de Anestesiología, Reanimación y Terapéutica del Dolor. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.

Document is current

Any future updates will be listed below