Zhang, Yingjie
Lyu, Lijun
Qiao, Kexin
Zhang, Zhiyu
Sun, Siwei
Hu, Lei
Chapter History
First Online: 17 December 2021
Change Date: 1 January 2022
Change Type: Correction
Change Details: The original version of this chapter “Out of Non-linearity: Search Impossible Differentials by the Bitwise Characteristic Matrix” contained the following errors which have been now corrected:
Change Details: (1) In section 2.2, a missing closing parenthesis has been included.
Change Details: (2) In section 3.1, a sentence was missing.
Change Details: (3) In section 3.2, an extra dot has been removed from first display equation.
Change Details: (4) In appendix A, the first 3 matrices which has been written in {\scriptsize}, due to the changes of the pages, we have changed the {\scriptsize} to {\small} for the first 3 matrices, and the other remain the same.
Change Details: The original version of this chapter “Automatic Key Recovery of Feistel Ciphers: Application to SIMON and SIMECK” contained the following error which has been now corrected:
Change Details: In the introduction part, “Crypto 2020” should be “Eurocrypt 2020”.
Conference Information
Conference Acronym: ISPEC
Conference Name: International Conference on Information Security Practice and Experience
Conference City: Nanjing
Conference Country: China
Conference Year: 2021
Conference Start Date: 17 December 2021
Conference End Date: 19 December 2021
Conference Number: 16
Conference ID: ispec2021
Conference URL: http://ispec2021.nuist.edu.cn
Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)
Type:
Conference Management System: EasyChair
Number of Submissions Sent for Review: 94
Number of Full Papers Accepted: 23
Number of Short Papers Accepted: 0
Acceptance Rate of Full Papers: 24% - The value is computed by the equation "Number of Full Papers Accepted / Number of Submissions Sent for Review * 100" and then rounded to a whole number.
Average Number of Reviews per Paper: 3
Average Number of Papers per Reviewer: 6
External Reviewers Involved: Yes
Additional Info on Review Process: Doble peer review