Document is current
Any future updates will be listed below
-
Authors
Hou, Lin
Zhang, Honghao
Peng, Yong
Wang, Shiming
Yao, Song
Li, Zhixiang
Deng, Gongxun
-
Funding
Funding for this research was provided by:
the National Key R&D Program of China (2016YFB1200505)
the Hu-Xiang Youth Talent Program (2018RS3002)
the Innovation-Driven Project of Central South University (2018CX021)
the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of Central South University (2018zzts165)
- License Information
-
More Information
Article History
Received: 25 June 2020
Revised: 14 August 2020
Accepted: 2 October 2020
First Online: 18 November 2020
Compliance with ethical standards
:
: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
: The optimization idea is expressed in Fig. , which guides the entire optimization process. In Stage 1, required structural design variables, material properties, and the simulation boundary condition are illustrated in Fig. , Fig. , and Fig. , respectively. The corresponding accurate data can be found in the text of the paper. In Stage 2, the DoE method can be implemented by the pseudocode. In Stage 3, finite element analysis results of DoE samples are reported in Fig. , and the surrogate model can be developed using the Isight software. In Stage 4, the optimization algorithm can be implemented by the pseudocode. In Stage 5, the final Pareto optimum can be calculated step by step using the proposed MCDM method in Section .
