Crossmark

Additional periarticular catheter shows no superiority over single‐shot local infiltration analgesia alone in unicondylar knee replacement

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-05981-y

Published Online: 2020-04-17

Published Print: 2021-02

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1007/springer_crossmark_policy

Authors

Meier, Malin

Burkhardt, Patrick

Huth, Jochen

Best, Raymond

Thienpont, Emmanuel

Beckmann, Johannes
License Information

Version of Record valid from 2020-04-17

Text and Data Mining valid from 2020-04-17

Version of Record valid from 2020-04-17
More Information

Article History

Received: 18 March 2020

Accepted: 2 April 2020

First Online: 17 April 2020

Compliance with ethical standards

:

: The authors MM, PB, JH, RB declare that they have no conflict of interest. The author ET declares that he is providing consultancies for Convatec, KCI, LIMA, Medacta and Zimmer Biomet. He also declares that he receives royalties from LIMA, Medacta and Zimmer Biomet. He further declares that he is part of the European knee society board. The author JB declares that he has no conflict of interest, receives honoraria from DePuy, Conformis, Pajunk and Smith & Nephew.

: This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was granted by the ethic committee of the local state medical council (Approv. No. F-2017-025).

: Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in this study.