Crossmark

Pain after permanent versus delayed absorbable monofilament suture for vaginal graft attachment during minimally invasive total hysterectomy and sacrocolpopexy

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-020-04471-6

Published Online: 2020-08-26

Published Print: 2020-10

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1007/springer_crossmark_policy

Authors

Bretschneider, C. Emi https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8129-9643
Kenton, Kimberly

Geller, Elizabeth J.

Wu, Jennifer M.

Matthews, Catherine A.
License Information

Text and Data Mining valid from 2020-08-26

Version of Record valid from 2020-08-26
More Information

Article History

Received: 18 June 2020

Accepted: 23 July 2020

First Online: 26 August 2020

Compliance with ethical standards

:

: Catherine A. Matthews and Kimberly Kenton are consultants for Boston Scientific Corporation and expert witnesses for defense, Johnson & Johnson. The other authors did not report any potential conflicts of interest. “Permanent versus delayed absorbable monofilament suture for vaginal graft attachment during minimally invasive total hysterectomy and sacrocolpopexy: a randomized control trial” (PACT trial) was sponsored by Boston Scientific Corporation.

Document is current

Any future updates will be listed below