Mercadante, Rosa
Cafagna, Simone
Rizzo, Marco
Roggia, Elisa
Fustinoni, Silvia
Funding for this research was provided by:
Università degli Studi di Milano
Article History
Received: 11 February 2026
Revised: 25 May 2026
Accepted: 15 June 2026
First Online: 4 July 2026
Change Date: 3 August 2026
Change Type: Update
Change Details: The original online version of this article was revised: Multiple table cross-references have been changed incorrectly throughout the manuscript. In addition, Table 2 has been altered and is no longer complete.
Change Date: 3 August 2026
Change Type: Correction
Change Details: A Correction to this paper has been published:
Change Details: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-026-06709-6
Declarations
Ethics approval: No ethical approval was sought. The urine used in the method application was residual anonymized clinical specimens obtained from the hospital’s clinical chemistry department after routine diagnostic testing; in accordance with institutional regulations and as approved by the review board of the Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda, the use of anonymized residual samples is permitted for method development, optimization, and validation purposes.
Source of biological material: Urine used in the method application was residual clinical specimens obtained from the hospital’s clinical chemistry department after routine diagnostic testing.
Conflict of interest: The authors declare no competing interests.