Updates are available Correction dated 2018-09-17
Click to view Correction: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-018-4163-4
-
Authors
Yhim, Ho-Young
Park, Yong
Han, Yeon-Hee
Kim, Sungeun
Kang, Sae-Ryung
Moon, Joon-Ho
Jeong, Ju Hye
Shin, Ho-Jin
Kim, Keunyoung
Choi, Yoon Seok
Kim, Kunho
Kim, Min Kyoung
Kong, Eunjung
Kim, Dae Sik
Eo, Jae Seon
Lee, Ji Hyun
Kang, Do-Young
Lee, Won Sik
Lee, Seok Mo
Do, Young Rok
Ham, Jun Soo
Kim, Seok Jin
Kim, Won Seog
Choi, Joon Young
Yang, Deok-Hwan
Kwak, Jae-Yong
-
Funding
Funding for this research was provided by:
Chonbuk National University Hospital
- License Information
-
More Information
Article History
Received: 18 April 2018
Accepted: 11 July 2018
First Online: 28 July 2018
Change Date: 17 September 2018
Change Type: Correction
Change Details: Unfortunately, the original version of this article contained several errors made during final step of article production. In the results section (fourth sentence) of the Abstract, the incomplete sentence,”, 31.4% in high-risk group and 4.7% in treatment failure group.
Compliance with ethical standards
:
: None.
: All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the principles of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
: This study protocol was approved by the institutional review board (IRB) of each participating institution. Because this study was a retrospective analysis involving no more than minimal risk to the subjects, the IRB granted a waiver of written informed consent.
