Updates are available Correction dated 2018-12-07
Click to view Correction: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-018-4216-8
-
Authors
Houdu, Benjamin
Lasnon, Charline
Licaj, Idlir
Thomas, Guy
Do, Pascal
Guizard, Anne-Valerie
Desmonts, Cédric
Aide, Nicolas http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9207-0847
- License Information
-
More Information
Article History
Received: 3 May 2018
Accepted: 28 August 2018
First Online: 14 September 2018
Change Date: 7 December 2018
Change Type: Correction
Change Details: An error occurred in the labelling of Fig. 3, where math symbols for SUV thresholds were inverted in panel b when the EARL threshold was applied to the PSF dataset and vice versa. This figure should read as follows: Fig. 3: Prognostic value of tumour SUVmax
Compliance with ethical standards
:
: All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
: None to declare.
: In accordance with European regulations, French observational studies without any additional therapy or monitoring procedure do not need the approval of an ethical committee. Nonetheless, we sought approval to collect data for our study from the national committee for data privacy, the National Commission on Informatics and Liberty (CNIL), with the registration n°2,080,317 v 0.
