Crossmark

Second-look PET-CT following an initial incomplete PET-CT response to (chemo)radiotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06401-7

Published Online: 2019-08-29

Published Print: 2020-02

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1007/springer_crossmark_policy

Authors

Prestwich, Robin J. D. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7872-2826
Arunsingh, Moses

Zhong, Jim

Dyker, Karen E.

Vaidyanathan, Sriram

Scarsbrook, Andrew F.
License Information

Text and Data Mining valid from 2019-08-29

Version of Record valid from 2019-08-29
More Information

Article History

Received: 18 May 2019

Revised: 3 July 2019

Accepted: 26 July 2019

First Online: 29 August 2019

Compliance with ethical standards

:

: The scientific guarantor of this publication is Robin Prestwich.

: The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies, whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.

: No complex statistical methods were necessary for this paper.

: Written informed consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board.

: Institutional Review Board approval was obtained.

: Some study subjects or cohorts have been previously reported in:Arunsingh M, Vaidyanathan S, Dyker KE, Sen M, Scarsbrook AF, Prestwich RJD (2019) Accuracy of response assessment positron emission tomographycomputed tomography following definitive radiotherapy without chemotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 31(4):212–218.Slevin F, Subesinghe M, Ramasamy S, Sen M, Scarsbrook AF, Prestwich RJ (2015) Assessment of outcomes with delayed (18)F-FDG PET-CT response assessment in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Br J Radiol 88(1052):20140592.

: • retrospective• observational• performed at one institution

Document is current

Any future updates will be listed below