Document is current
Any future updates will be listed below
-
Authors
Hosseinzadeh, Matin
Saha, Anindo
Brand, Patrick
Slootweg, Ilse
de Rooij, Maarten
Huisman, Henkjan https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6753-3221
-
Funding
Funding for this research was provided by:
Siemens Healthineers
H2020 European Research Council
- License Information
-
More Information
Article History
Received: 5 April 2021
Revised: 18 August 2021
Accepted: 7 September 2021
First Online: 16 November 2021
Declarations
:
: The scientific guarantor of this publication is Henkjan Huisman.
: The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.
: Several of the authors have significant statistical expertise.
: Written informed consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board.
: Institutional Review Board approval was obtained.
: Some study subjects or cohorts have been previously reported in:<i>M. van der Leest, E. Cornel, B. Israel, R. Hendriks, A. R. Padhani, M. Hoogenboom, P. Zamecnik, D. Bakker, A. Y. Setiasti, J. Veltman, and others, “Head-to-head comparison of transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy versus multiparametric prostate resonance imaging with subsequent magnetic resonance-guided biopsy in biopsy-naïve men with elevated prostate-specific antigen: A large prospective multicenter clinical study,” European Urology, vol. 75, no. 4, pp. 570–578, 2019.</i>
: • retrospective• observational• multicenter study
