Schurink, Niels W.
van Kranen, Simon R.
van Griethuysen, Joost J. M.
Roberti, Sander
Snaebjornsson, Petur
Bakers, Frans C. H.
de Bie, Shira H.
Bosma, Gerlof P. T.
Cappendijk, Vincent C.
Geenen, Remy W. F.
Neijenhuis, Peter A.
Peterson, Gerald M.
Veeken, Cornelis J.
Vliegen, Roy F. A.
Peters, Femke P.
Bogveradze, Nino
el Khababi, Najim
Lahaye, Max J.
Maas, Monique
Beets, Geerard L.
Beets-Tan, Regina G. H.
Lambregts, Doenja M. J. http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2990-0099
Article History
First Online: 14 July 2023
Declarations
:
: The scientific guarantor of this publication is Doenja Lambregts, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
: The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies, whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.
: One of the authors (Sander Roberti) has significant statistical expertise.
: Written informed consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board.
: Approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Boards of all participating centres.
: Some study subjects or cohorts have been previously reported in the following:<i>Schurink NW, van Kranen S, Roberti S, et al (2022) Sources of variation in multicenter rectal MRI data and their effect on radiomics feature reproducibility. Eur Radiol. 32:1506-1516.</i><i>Bogveradze, N., El Khababi, N., Schurink, N. W., et al (2022). Evolutions in rectal cancer MRI staging and risk stratification in The Netherlands. Abdominal radiology, 47(1):38–47.</i>The aims of these publications are different than the current novel study.The first study investigates the influence of acquisition variation on imaging features. The lessons from this study were used and applied in this study to develop response prediction models.The second study describes how radiology staging and reporting have changed over the course of 10 years, which is the span of this cohort.
: • retrospective• observational• multicentre study