Updates are available Correction dated 2026-02-04
Click to view Correction: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-025-12216-6
-
Authors
Croes, Goswin O. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4184-0199
Nijholt, Ingrid M.
Boomsma, Martijn F.
Bleeker, Gitta
Greuter, Marcel J. W.
Jeukens, Cécile R. L. P. N.
van Pul, Carola
Siegersma, Jenny
Streekstra, Geert J.
Vegter, Alie
,
van Pul, Carola
Dam-Vervloet, Alida J.
- License Information
-
More Information
Article History
Received: 23 June 2024
Revised: 25 February 2025
Accepted: 6 April 2025
First Online: 6 September 2025
Change Date: 1 December 2025
Change Type: Update
Change Details: The original online version of this article was revised: Authors’ initials have been added back for indexing reason.
Change Date: 4 February 2026
Change Type: Correction
Change Details: A Correction to this paper has been published:
Change Details: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-025-12216-6
Compliance with ethical standards
:
: The scientific guarantor of this publication is A.J. Dam-Vervloet.
: The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies, whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.
: One of the authors has significant statistical expertise.
: Written informed consent was not required for this study because this study concerned a retrospective data collection of anonymised patient data which only included examination protocol, date of procedure, dose levels and age.
: Ethics committee approval was not required because this study was a survey on patient doses to assess diagnostic reference levels, carried out in accordance with DRLs, national regulations, and international guidance.
:
