Updates are available Correction dated 2019-09-24
Click to view Correction: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00408-019-00269-6
-
Authors
Lam, Vincent K.
Miller, Mary
Dowling, Lynn
Singhal, Shyamali
Young, Robert P.
Cabebe, Elwyn C.
- License Information
-
More Information
Article History
Received: 26 September 2014
Accepted: 1 December 2014
First Online: 11 December 2014
Change Date: 24 September 2019
Change Type: Correction
Change Date: 24 September 2019
Change Type: Correction
Change Details: The original version of this article contained an error in the usage of the term ���false positive rate���. The intention of the authors in those instances was simply to compare the absolute percentage of false positive results in the study vs the NLST, not to make any observations about false positive rate in the strict statistical sense (i.e. Type I error probability).
Change Details: The original version of this article contained an error in the usage of the term ���false positive rate���. The intention of the authors in those instances was simply to compare the absolute percentage of false positive results in the study vs the NLST, not to make any observations about false positive rate in the strict statistical sense (i.e. Type I error probability).
