Braulke, Friederike
Para, Servet
Alt-Epping, Bernd
Tewes, Mitra
Bäumer, Markus
Haberland, Birgit
Mayer-Steinacker, Regine
Hopprich, Anne
de Wit, Maike
Grabe, Michaela
Bender-Säbelkampf, Sophia
Weßling, Caroline
Aulmann, Christoph
Gerlach, Christina
Regincos, Pascale
Fischer, Ferdinand
Haarmann, Soraya
Huys, Tatjana
Drygas, Sabine
Rambau, Anett
Kiani, Alexander
Schnabel, Astrid
Buhl, Christoph
Seipke, Stefanie
Hiemer, Sonja
Polata, Silke
Meßmann, Maximilian
Hansmeier, Anna
Anastasiadou, Louiza
Letsch, Anne
Wecht, Daniel
Hellberg-Naegele, Matthias
Krug, Utz
Wedding, Ulrich http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0333-8643
van Oorschot, Birgitt
Funding for this research was provided by:
Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena
Article History
Received: 7 April 2023
Accepted: 24 April 2023
First Online: 5 May 2023
Declarations
:
: All authors declare no conflict of interests.
: This project represents a quality management measure to control the feasibility of the assessment of a quality indicator of the evidence-based national guideline for palliative care in German Cancer Centers. The central Research Ethics Committee of the University of Würzburg has confirmed that no further ethical approval is required (Nr. 20220302 01).
: As this project represents a quality management measure to control the feasibility of the assessment of a quality indicator of the evidence-based national guideline for palliative care in German hospitals in daily practise patients could reject screening without reasons.
: This manuscript does not contain individual patient´s data.