Document is current
Any future updates will be listed below
-
Authors
Ferreira, Bianca A.
Martins, Thaynan F. C.
Coser, Elizabeth M.
da L. Oliveira, Viviane
Yamashiro-Kanashiro, Edite H.
Rocha, Mussya C.
Pinto, Marcelo M.
Cotrim, Paulo C.
Coelho, Adriano C.
-
Funding
Funding for this research was provided by:
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (2016/21171-6)
UK Research and Innovation (MR/P027989/1)
- License Information
-
More Information
Article History
Received: 13 March 2022
Accepted: 4 July 2022
First Online: 8 July 2022
Declarations
:
: The authors declare no competing interests.
: This study was approved by the Ethics Committee for Animal Experimentation of the Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo, Universidade de São Paulo (USP) [Protocol: CEP-IMT 2011/104]. Experiments using mice were approved by the Ethics Committee for Animal Experimentation of the Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) [Protocols: 4797–1/2018 and 4797–1(A)/2019]. Euthanasia of the dogs followed the technical rules established by the Federal Board of Veterinary Medicine of Brazil (CFMV resolution No. 714/2002). For sample collection for biopsy and euthanasia of the dogs, owners were previously notified about this study and signed a statement of informed consent.
: Not applicable.
: Not applicable.
: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
