Updates are available Correction dated 2018-05-04
Click to view Correction: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-018-9903-x
-
Authors
Krekeler, Brittany N.
Broadfoot, Courtney K.
Johnson, Stephen
Connor, Nadine P.
Rogus-Pulia, Nicole
-
Funding
Funding for this research was provided by:
National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R01DC005935)
National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R01DC014358)
National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R01DC008149)
National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (T32-DC009401)
- License Information
-
More Information
Article History
Received: 1 August 2017
Accepted: 19 September 2017
First Online: 30 September 2017
Change Date: 4 May 2018
Change Type: Correction
Change Details: The original version of this article unfortunately contains mistakes. The second sentence in the section “Results”, under the heading “Study Design” was incorrect. It should read as: Two studies [24, 29] used a prospective cohort study design with a JAMA rating of 2. Four studies [17, 25, 27, 34] completed retrospective studies earning a JAMA score of 3. Four studies [26, 28, 30, 33] earned a JAMA quality rating score of 4 and used the following designs: case series [26, 28, 33], and pilot study [30]. In Table 1, “Study Population (n)” and “Design (JAMA quality rating)” values were incorrect for Shinn et al. (2013) [24]. The correct information is given here. HNC (n = 109) Prospective Cohort (2).
Compliance with Ethical Standards
:
: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
