Crossmark

Does adding coaching calls into an online lifestyle intervention for cancer survivors make it more acceptable and feasible than a self-guided version?

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-025-10263-9

Published Online: 2026-01-22

Published Print: 2026-02

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1007/springer_crossmark_policy

Authors

Freeman, Nicola

Leske, Morgan

Koczwara, Bogda

Morris, Julia

Daly, Anthony

Beatty, Lisa
Funding

Funding for this research was provided by:

This work was funded internally by Cancer Council SA and the Flinders University Innovation Partnership Seed Grant.

Flinders University
License Information

Text and Data Mining valid from 2026-01-22

Version of Record valid from 2026-01-22
More Information

Article History

Received: 23 March 2025

Accepted: 10 December 2025

First Online: 22 January 2026

Declarations

:

: This study was approved by the Cancer Council Victoria Human Research Ethics Committee (Project HREC 2106), as per the NHMRC National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research in line with the Declaration of Helsinki.

: Participants signed informed consent regarding publishing data and quotes confidentially.

: Participants signed informed consent regarding publishing data and quotes confidentially.

: The author acknowledges that this research was conducted as a requirement of a Bachelor in Psychology (Honours). There are no other competing interests.

Document is current

Any future updates will be listed below