Crossmark

Methodological considerations in calculating the minimal clinically important change score for the core outcome measures index (COMI): insights from a large single-centre spine surgery registry

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-024-08537-7

Published Online: 2024-10-28

Published Print: 2024-12

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1007/springer_crossmark_policy

Authors

Cina, Andrea https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6016-6200
Vitale, Jacopo

Haschtmann, Daniel

Loibl, Markus

Fekete, Tamas F.

Kleinstück, Frank

Galbusera, Fabio

Jutzeler, Catherine R.

Mannion, Anne F.
Funding

Funding for this research was provided by:

Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich
License Information

Text and Data Mining valid from 2024-10-28

Version of Record valid from 2024-10-28
More Information

Article History

Received: 9 August 2024

Revised: 19 September 2024

Accepted: 16 October 2024

First Online: 28 October 2024

Declarations

:

: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

: Ethics approval and consent to participate. The study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by ethics (KEK-ZH-2023-01683). Patients gave their written informed consent before being included in the database. IRB: Ethics committee approval, KEK-ZH-2023-01683

Document is current

Any future updates will be listed below