Crossmark

Outcomes after revision of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty to reverse shoulder arthroplasty and comparison between cemented or metal-backed glenoid in platform systems

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-026-04777-z

Published Online: 2026-05-22

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1007/springer_crossmark_policy

Authors

Zampeli, Frantzeska

Kazum, Efi

Gomez, Alejandro

Valenti, Philippe
License Information

Text and Data Mining valid from 2026-05-22

Version of Record valid from 2026-05-22
More Information

Article History

Received: 27 December 2025

Accepted: 3 May 2026

First Online: 22 May 2026

Declarations

:

: All experimental protocols were approved by institutional local ethics committee IRB accreditation: 0990 − 0279, Approval number: IRB_ADENE_20240602. No informed consent to participate was obtained from the participants in the study. This study was classified as observational (non-interventional) by institutional local ethics committee. Statutory and ethical obligations of observational (non-interventional) studies in our country: According to the past Huriet law on biomedical research, and to the current regulation that went into effect in August 2006 (law n°2004 − 806), such studies do not require written consent. This observational research on data fulfils current national regulatory and ethical obligations.

: Not applicable.

: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Document is current

Any future updates will be listed below