Ozan, Emre https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9872-8152
Muftuoglu, Bahadir https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7789-1038
Sahindokuyucu, Ismail https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7770-5082
Kurucay, Hanne Nur https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5157-2090
Inal, Sinem
Kuruca, Nilufer
Elhag, Ahmed Eisa https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0738-1825
Karaca, Efe
Tamer, Cuneyt https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3240-8425
Gumusova, Semra https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8574-521X
Albayrak, Harun https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4468-2790
Barry, Gerald
Gulbahar, Mustafa Yavuz https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8268-7659
Yazici, Zafer https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2806-7878
Article History
Received: 16 September 2020
Accepted: 15 November 2020
First Online: 6 January 2021
Compliance with ethical standards
:
: The authors declare that there is no potential conflict of interest.
: For this study, an ethical statement was not applicable, because the samples were collected from chickens that had died due to the virus infection in the flocks. No culling was done for the sampling process.
: The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in the GenBank database at under the name TrMDV1/19 and accession number MN817545.