Crossmark

Comparison of four different suture materials in respect to oral wound healing, microbial colonization, tissue reaction and clinical features—randomized clinical study

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-03034-4

Published Online: 2019-07-24

Published Print: 2020-04

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1007/springer_crossmark_policy

Authors

Dragovic, Miroslav

Pejovic, Marko

Stepic, Jelena

Colic, Snjezana

Dozic, Branko

Dragovic, Svetlana

Lazarevic, Milos

Nikolic, Nadja

Milasin, Jelena

Milicic, Biljana
Funding

Funding for this research was provided by:

Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development, Republic of Serbia (175 075)
License Information

Text and Data Mining valid from 2019-07-24

Version of Record valid from 2019-07-24
More Information

Article History

Received: 10 May 2019

Accepted: 16 July 2019

First Online: 24 July 2019

Compliance with ethical standards

:

: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

: All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

: Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Document is current

Any future updates will be listed below