Document is current
Any future updates will be listed below
-
Authors
Işıklı, Kemal https://orcid.org/0009-0003-2620-6007
Koc Vural, Uzay https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8764-2174
Yalcin Cakir, Filiz https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7972-5391
-
Funding
Funding for this research was provided by:
Hacettepe University
- License Information
-
More Information
Article History
Received: 5 January 2026
Accepted: 10 April 2026
First Online: 2 May 2026
Declarations
:
: The authors declare no competing interests.
: The protocol of the study was approved by the both Clinical Research Ethics Committee of the University (No: 2022/07 − 03, dated 26.04.2022) and Regulation on Medical Device Clinical Trials (Official Gazette No. 29111, dated 06.09.2014). Permission to conduct the study was granted by the Turkish Medicines and Medical Devices Agency (TITCK) (Approval No: E-68869993-511.06-804783, dated 04.07.2022).
: Tested bioactive restorative materials can be regarded as dependable substitutes for traditional composite resin in Class II restorations within regulated clinical settings.
