Document is current
Any future updates will be listed below
-
Authors
Joshi, Mrudula https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7312-351X
R., Naveen https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2014-3925
Jagtap, Kshitij https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2729-737X
Gupta, Ria https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3720-4520
Agarwal, Vikas https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4508-1233
Aggarwal, Rohit https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7531-8038
Goel, Ashish https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8513-2624
Gupta, Latika https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2753-2990
- License Information
-
More Information
Article History
Received: 11 October 2022
Revised: 11 January 2023
Accepted: 23 January 2023
First Online: 9 February 2023
Compliance with ethical standards
:
: No human subjects were involved in the conduct of this study. The study included a review of video content posted on YouTube® which falls under the category of open source distribution. The study was exempt from ethical review. The study analysed open source data therefore IRB approvals were not required.
: RA has/had a consultancy relationship with and/or has received research funding from the following companies-Bristol Myers-Squibb, Pfizer, Genentech, Octapharma, CSL Behring, Mallinckrodt, AstraZeneca, Corbus, Kezar, and Abbvie, Janssen, Alexion, Argenx, Q32, EMD-Serono, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roivant.Rest of the authors have no conflict of interest relevant to this manuscript.
