Document is current
Any future updates will be listed below
-
Authors
-
Funding
Funding for this research was provided by:
Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (RGPIN-2016-0632)
- License Information
-
More Information
Article History
Received: 10 July 2019
Revised: 21 January 2020
Accepted: 27 January 2020
First Online: 5 February 2020
Compliance with ethical standards
:
: All applicable international, national, and institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed. The methods used in this cognitive experiment were approved by the Uganda Wildlife Authority (UWA), the Uganda National Council for Science and Technology (UNCST), and the University of Toronto Animal Care Committee (UACC). Individuals were not captured, handled, or restrained for the duration of data collection. Participation was entirely voluntary and opportunistic, and individuals were free to leave the platform setup at any time. The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
: Kumpan, Smeltzer, and Teichroeb declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
