Crossmark

Isotretinoin plus 420 nm intense pulsed light versus isotretinoin alone for the treatment of acne vulgaris: a randomized, controlled study of efficacy, safety, and patient satisfaction in Chinese subjects

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-020-03113-z

Published Online: 2020-07-30

Published Print: 2021-04

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1007/springer_crossmark_policy

Authors

Li, Yiming

Zhu, Jiangting

Zhang, Yunjie

Liu, Xiarong

Ye, Junru https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4146-9142
License Information

Text and Data Mining valid from 2020-07-30

Version of Record valid from 2020-07-30
More Information

Article History

Received: 6 June 2020

Accepted: 27 July 2020

First Online: 30 July 2020

Compliance with ethical standards

:

: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

: The study was reviewed and approved by the First Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College ethical committee. The study protocol followed the guidelines of the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. All patients signed informed consent before participating in the study.

: Informed consent was obtained from all the participants included in the study.

: The authors affirm that human research participants provided informed consent for publication of the images in Figs. and .

Document is current

Any future updates will be listed below