Borza, Péter http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8555-8235
Huber, Thomas
Leitner, Patrick
Remund, Nadine
Graf, Wolfram
Funding for this research was provided by:
EU FP7 (603378)
GINOP (2.3.2-15-2016-00019)
Article History
Received: 8 November 2017
Accepted: 30 March 2018
First Online: 5 April 2018
Change Date: 14 August 2018
Change Type: Correction
Change Details: A calibration mistake caused systematic error in the microscopic measurements; all filter mesh size values should be divided by a factor of 2.56. As our conclusions were based on the inter- and intraspecific variations of the trait, this systematic error does not influence them in any way.Filter mesh sizes ranged between 2.47 and 7.17 μm in C. curvispinum, between 1.83 and 5.09 μm in C. robustum, and between 1.03 and 2.68 μm in C. sowinskyi. Interspecific differences were estimated correctly as 1.12 μm (SE = 0.15) between C. curvispinum and C. robustum, and 1.37 μm (SE = 0.15) between C. robustum and C. sowinskyi. The correct version of Figure 2 and Table 3 are provided in this correction.