Updates are available Correction dated 2020-01-27
Click to view Correction: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10474-020-01017-6
-
Authors
Baier, S.
Bansal, A.
Singh, R. Kumar
- License Information
-
More Information
Article History
Received: 20 March 2018
Revised: 18 May 2018
Accepted: 22 May 2018
First Online: 7 August 2018
Change Date: 27 January 2020
Change Type: Correction
Change Date: 27 January 2020
Change Type: Correction
Change Type: Correction
Change Type: Correction
Change Details: In [3], we derived three results in additive combinatorics for function fields. The proofs of these results depended on a recent bound for the large sieve with sparse sets of moduli for function fields by the first and third-named authors in [1]. Unfortunately, they discovered an error in this paper and demonstrated in [2] that this result cannot hold in full generality. In the present paper, we formulate a plausible conjecture under which the said three results in [3] remain true and the method of proof goes through using the same arguments. However, these results are now only conditional and still await a full proof.
Change Details: In [3], we derived three results in additive combinatorics for function fields. The proofs of these results depended on a recent bound for the large sieve with sparse sets of moduli for function fields by the first and third-named authors in [1]. Unfortunately, they discovered an error in this paper and demonstrated in [2] that this result cannot hold in full generality. In the present paper, we formulate a plausible conjecture under which the said three results in [3] remain true and the method of proof goes through using the same arguments. However, these results are now only conditional and still await a full proof.
Change Date: 27 January 2020
Change Details: In [3], we derived three results in additive combinatorics for function fields. The proofs of these results depended on a recent bound for the large sieve with sparse sets of moduli for function fields by the first and third-named authors in [1]. Unfortunately, they discovered an error in this paper and demonstrated in [2] that this result cannot hold in full generality. In the present paper, we formulate a plausible conjecture under which the said three results in [3] remain true and the method of proof goes through using the same arguments. However, these results are now only conditional and still await a full proof.
Change Details: In [3], we derived three results in additive combinatorics for function fields. The proofs of these results depended on a recent bound for the large sieve with sparse sets of moduli for function fields by the first and third-named authors in [1]. Unfortunately, they discovered an error in this paper and demonstrated in [2] that this result cannot hold in full generality. In the present paper, we formulate a plausible conjecture under which the said three results in [3] remain true and the method of proof goes through using the same arguments. However, these results are now only conditional and still await a full proof.
Change Date: 27 January 2020
