da Rocha Matos, Joana https://orcid.org/0009-0007-7195-7976
da Silva Carneiro, Adriani https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6141-8548
Corrêa, Thaís Almeida https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6909-2925
Mesquita, Emily https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4263-1332
Meirelles, Laura Nobrega https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2214-5038
Bório, Victória Silvestre https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1748-0747
de Castro Monteiro-Sobrinho, Américo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4046-6668
van Tol de Castro, Tadeu Augusto https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4095-3976
García, Andrés Calderín https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5963-3847
Camargo, Mariana Guedes https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4132-8910
da Costa Angelo, Isabele https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3698-8340
Silva, José Francisco Arruda e https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0604-8174
Quintela, Eliane Dias
Gôlo, Patrícia Silva https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1854-7488
Bittencourt, Vânia Rita Elias Pinheiro https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8473-8501
Funding for this research was provided by:
Universidade Federal Rural Do Rio De Janeiro
Article History
Received: 13 November 2025
Accepted: 6 February 2026
First Online: 2 March 2026
Declarations
:
: The authors declare no competing interests.
: No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
: This study was performed in line with the principles of the Brazilian Guideline for the Care and Use of Animals for Scientific and Education Purposes and the study was approved by the Animal Use Ethics Committee (CEUA) of the Veterinary Institute (IV) of UFRRJ (nº 9714220419, date: 30/08/2019).