Retraction Retraction dated 2023-06-14

Article History

Received: 28 January 2022

Revised: 25 February 2023

Accepted: 27 February 2023

First Online: 29 March 2023

Change Date: 10 May 2023

Change Type: Update

Change Details: Publisher’s Note: readers are alerted that concerns have been raised regarding methodology as described in this article. The publisher is currently investigating this matter and a further response will follow the conclusion of this investigation.

Change Date: 16 May 2023

Change Type: Update

Change Details: Publisher's Note: the Supplementary Information has been removed due to a lack of documented consent by study participants.

Change Date: 14 June 2023

Change Type: Correction

Change Details: This article has been retracted. Please see the Retraction Notice for more detail:

Change Details: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-023-02635-1

Declarations

:

: None to declare.

: The first author and creator of the survey is not affiliated with any university or hospital. Thus, she did not seek approval from an IRB. After seeing a presentation of preliminary survey results by the first author, the second author suggested the data to be analyzed and submitted as an academic article (he was not involved in collecting the data). The second author consulted with his university’s IRB, who declined to certify the study because data were already collected. However, they advised that publishing the results was likely ethical provided data were deidentified. Editor’s note: After I reviewed the manuscript, I concluded that its publication is ethically appropriate, consistent with Springer policy.