Updates are available Correction dated 2021-07-02
Click to view Correction: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-020-00737-6
-
Authors
Juríčková, Veronika http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6618-9799
Bozděchová, Adéla
Machová, Kristýna http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1793-8789
Vadroňová, Mariana http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7748-1701
-
Funding
Funding for this research was provided by:
National institute of mental health (LO1611)
Charles University (Q06/LF1=20)
- License Information
-
More Information
Article History
Accepted: 7 October 2020
First Online: 19 October 2020
Change Date: 2 July 2021
Change Type: Correction
Change Details: A Correction to this paper has been published:
Change Details: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-020-00737-6
Compliance with Ethical Standards
:
: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
: In accordance with Springer policy and ethical obligation as researchers, we report that we have no financial and/or business interests that may be affected by the research reported in the enclosed paper.
: In our study, an animal is included and the work with it has been authorized and based on the determination of the Ethical Board of the Czech University of Life sciences. This provision is not an attempt and all animal welfare have been followed. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Czech University of Life Sciences Prague
: Informed consent was obtained from parents on behalf of the children enrolled in the study and all children were asked about their preference for the potential presence of the dog during the therapeutic sessions before the enrollment. Both the school management and parents agreed to involve the dog in the class. The dog was involved in teaching in previous years and attended regularly. In this particular year, two students were selected for whom the effect of the dog‘s presence was described and the parents agreed to publish the results.
