Updates are available Correction dated 2025-11-20

Article History

Received: 7 March 2024

Accepted: 29 September 2025

First Online: 24 October 2025

Change Date: 20 November 2025

Change Type: Correction

Change Details: A Correction to this paper has been published:

Change Details: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13852-7

Declarations

:

: The researcher adhered to all ethical principles of scientific research throughout the study. Initially, a research proposal was prepared and submitted to the ethics committee of a university in Türkiye. Following the committee’s evaluation, an approval certificate confirming compliance with ethical standards was obtained. Subsequently, a request for research permission was submitted to the MoNE, accompanied by various documents, including the ethics approval certificate. After conducting the necessary reviews, the MoNE research committee granted permission for the study to proceed. The research was conducted entirely on a voluntary basis. At the outset, participants were informed about the process and data collection methods through forms mandated by MoNE, including the student voluntary participation form, parental consent form, and teacher voluntary participation form. Consent was obtained from all stakeholders. To protect privacy, pseudonyms were used in the presentation of qualitative data. Furthermore, GenAI models were utilized in the classroom under the supervision and guidance of the teacher to ensure their appropriate and ethical use.

: There is not any conflict of interest in the study.