Marsot, Myriam
Poulet, Nicolas
Delmotte, Sébastien
Côte, Jessica
Delehelle, Franklin
Descouens, Didier
Douay, Guillaume
Leclerc, Antoine
Mulot, Baptiste
Chenet, Baptiste
Berthet, Mélanie
Quintard, Benoit
King, Turi
Couette, Sébastien
Balaresque, Patricia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3516-5537
Funding for this research was provided by:
Interdisciplinary research programs department (Defi X-Life)
Interdisciplinary research programs department (PEPS Audevol)
Article History
Received: 13 August 2025
Accepted: 12 November 2025
First Online: 11 February 2026
Declarations
:
: We chose a protocol specifically designed to minimise any impact on the primates studied. To that end, our auditory measurements were conducted only during the annual health checks routinely performed by the participating zoos and wildlife parks, in full compliance with national animal welfare regulations in France. As anaesthesia was administered solely for veterinary purposes—as part of routine clinical care and not for research—and given that the auditory test employed stimulus intensity levels comparable to those used in neonatal human hearing screening (80–84 dB), no authorisation was required from the French Ministry of Research (Autorisation de Projet à des Fins Scientifiques, APAFIS). Owing to the specific nature of both the procedure and the test employed, this work does not fall within the scope of experimental procedures requiring approval under Article R.214-99 of the French Rural Code, and consequently, no associated procedure number applies.
: All authors consent to publish this paper.
: The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.