Funding for this research was provided by:
National Institute of Mental Health (MH135649)
National Institute of Mental Health (MH129564)
National Institute of Mental Health (MH130664)
National Institute of Mental Health (MH098060)
National Institute of Mental Health (MH130397)
Article History
Accepted: 6 March 2025
First Online: 22 March 2025
Change Date: 1 July 2026
Change Type: Update
Change Details: The chapter "Parental History of Major Depressive Disorder Moderates the Relation Between Neighborhood Disadvantage and Reward Responsiveness in Children", written by Elana S. Israel, Cope Feurer, Aliona Tsypes, and Brandon E. Gibb, was originally published without open access. Following the author’s/authors’ decision to opt for open access, the copyright of the chapter changed on June 11, 2026 to © The Author(s) 2025 and the chapter is now distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
:
: This project was supported by grants National Institute of Mental Health grants MH135649 (EI), MH129564 (CF), MH130664 (AT), MH098060 (BG), and MH130397 (BG). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
: The authors have no competing or potential conflicts of interest.
: All study procedures were approved by the university’s Institutional Review Board. This study was conducted in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent/assent was collected from all participants.