Crossmark

A comparison of ventilation with a non-invasive ventilator versus standard O2 with a nasal cannula for colonoscopy with moderate sedation using propofol

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-019-00426-5

Published Online: 2019-11-23

Published Print: 2020-12

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1007/springer_crossmark_policy

Authors

Fogarty, Mike https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4342-9494
Orr, Joseph A.

Sakata, Derek

Brewer, Lara

Johnson, Ken

Fang, John C.

Kuck, Kai
Clinical Trials ^BETA

Clinical trials referenced in this document:

nct02623270 at ClinicalTrials.gov

Documents that mention this clinical trial

A comparison of ventilation with a non-invasive ventilator versus standard O2 with a nasal cannula for colonoscopy with moderate sedation using propofol
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-019-00426-5
Funding

Funding for this research was provided by:

Utah Space Grant Consortium
License Information

Text and Data Mining valid from 2019-11-23

Version of Record valid from 2019-11-23
More Information

Article History

Received: 11 July 2019

Accepted: 17 November 2019

First Online: 23 November 2019

Compliance with ethical standards

:

: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Document is current

Any future updates will be listed below