Document is current
Any future updates will be listed below
-
Authors
Yost, Ryley T. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0637-2871
Liang, Emerald
Stewart, Megan P.
Chui, Selwyn
Greco, Andrew F.
Long, Shirley Q.
McDonald, Ian S.
McDowell, Tim https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5334-1923
McNeil, Jeremy N. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2702-0293
Simon, Anne F. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6509-4541
-
Funding
Funding for this research was provided by:
Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (04507-2015, 04275-2015)
- License Information
-
More Information
Article History
Received: 27 October 2020
Revised: 1 July 2021
Accepted: 13 July 2021
First Online: 17 August 2021
Declarations
:
: No approval is required from the Western’s Animal Care Committee or the Provincial and Federal regulatory bodies to study invertebrates. However, we provided appropriate rearing conditions and anesthetized flies using CO<sub>2</sub> or cold anaesthesia when manipulating flies for colony maintenance. Stress treatments to produce dSO resulted in no mortality.<b><i>Preprint</i></b> Finally, the behavioural portion of this manuscript can be found on bioRxiv—a preprint server for biology, operated by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory: Yost et al. () Is <i>Drosophila melanogaster</i> Stress Odorant (dSO) really an alarm pheromone? bioRxiv:534719 doi:10.1101/534719.
: None
