Crossmark

Testing alternative regression models to predict utilities: mapping the QLQ-C30 onto the EQ-5D-5L and the SF-6D

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1981-6

Published Online: 2018-09-01

Published Print: 2018-11

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1007/springer_crossmark_policy

Authors

Lamu, Admassu N. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6638-421X
Olsen, Jan Abel
License Information

Text and Data Mining valid from 2018-09-01
More Information

Article History

Accepted: 28 August 2018

First Online: 1 September 2018

Compliance with ethical standards

:

: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

: Ethical approval was granted by the Monash University Human Research Ethics Committee (Reference No. CF11/3192–2011001748). All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

: Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.