Voormolen, Daphne C. http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0449-0708
,
van Exel, Job
Brouwer, Werner
Sköldunger, Anders
Gonçalves-Pereira, Manuel
Irving, Kate
Bieber, Anja
Selbaek, Geir
Woods, Bob
Zanetti, Orazio
Verhey, Frans
Wimo, Anders
Handels, Ron L. H.
Funding for this research was provided by:
JPND (FCT-JPND-HC/0001/2012)
Erasmus University
Article History
Accepted: 25 September 2020
First Online: 28 October 2020
Compliance with ethical standards
:
: All authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
: All individual countries received ethical approval in their own country. Ethical consideration differs between countries: Medischeethische toetsingscommissie (NL), Wales Research Ethics Committee 5, Bangor (UK), Ethics committee of the Medical Faculty, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg (DE), Regional committee for medical and health research ethics, South-East B (NO), the Regional Ethics Review Board (SW), Dublin City University Research Ethics Committee (IE), Ethics Committee of the Nova Medical School, Ethics Committee of Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Ocidental, Ethics Committee of ARSLVT, Ethics Committee of ARSA, Comissão Nacional de Protecção de Dados (PT), Comitato Etico, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di DioFatebenefratelli (IT). All participating NHS sites in the UK received permission to perform the study. The caregiver and the person with dementia both signed a separate informed consent form, after they had sufficient time to read the form and ask questions if needed. The study protocol complies with the Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act and codes on ‘good use’ of clinical data.
: The caregiver and the person with dementia both signed a separate informed consent form, after they had sufficient time to read the form and ask questions if needed.