Sjetne, Ingeborg Strømseng https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9086-1415
Smith, Nick https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9793-6988
Towers, Ann-Marie https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3597-1061
Renolen, Åste https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1521-3688
Magnussen, Siv Fladsrud https://orcid.org/0009-0007-6921-4620
Burrell, Lisa Victoria https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8977-5632
Veenstra, Marijke https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1864-929X
Sogstad, Maren K. Raknes https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2809-1384
Funding for this research was provided by:
Norwegian Institute of Public Health
Article History
Received: 22 July 2025
Accepted: 21 February 2026
First Online: 1 April 2026
Declarations
:
: The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
: From the manuscript section Ethical considerations: “The Data Protection Officer at the Norwegian Institute of Public Health found the personal data limited and not requiring ethical approval. The large project of which the translation was a part was approved by the Regional Committee for Medical and Health Research Ethics (ref nr 257661).”
: From the manuscript section Ethical considerations: Before consenting to participate they [informants in the cognitive debriefing] received written information about their rights and the purpose of the interviews, and that the interviews would be recorded, transcribed, and the voice recordings then deleted.
: This study did not include any individual person’s personal data in any form.