Crossmark

Improving the Argumentation Abilities of High School Students in China via the Toulmin Argumentation Pattern, Popper’s Falsificationism, and the Game of Eleusis

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-025-00656-x

Published Online: 2025-06-13

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1007/springer_crossmark_policy

Authors

Shi, Xiaoming https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2290-1155
Funding

Funding for this research was provided by:

Ningbo Philosophy and Social Sciences Planning Project (G2024-1-55)
License Information

Text and Data Mining valid from 2025-06-13

Version of Record valid from 2025-06-13
More Information

Article History

Received: 18 August 2024

Revised: 8 May 2025

Accepted: 17 May 2025

First Online: 13 June 2025

Declarations

:

: The study received ethical approval from the University’s Research Ethics Committee. Additionally, the study met the ethical guidelines of the American Psychological Association (APA, 2017).

: Informed consent was obtained from all participants involved in the study and the study was approved by the Ethics Committee. All participants were provided with detailed information about the study, including their right to withdraw at any time without penalty.

: The author declares no conflict of interest.

Document is current

Any future updates will be listed below