Duporge, Isla https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8463-2459
Kholiavchenko, Maksim https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6757-1957
Harel, Roi https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9733-8643
Wolf, Scott https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4397-1395
Rubenstein, Daniel I https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9049-5219
Crofoot, Margaret C https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0056-7950
Berger-Wolf, Tanya https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7610-1412
Lee, Stephen J
Barreau, Julie
Kline, Jenna https://orcid.org/0009-0006-7301-5774
Ramirez, Michelle https://orcid.org/0009-0008-8162-5729
Stewart, Charles V https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6532-6675
Funding for this research was provided by:
National Science Foundation (2118240, 2112606)
U.S. Army Aeromedical Research Laboratory
National Academy of Sciences
Article History
Received: 20 September 2024
Accepted: 27 May 2025
First Online: 16 June 2025
Declarations
:
: We declare no competing interests.
: All authors consent that the publisher has the author’s permission to publish research findings.
: The research was conducted under the authority of NACOSTI/P/22/18214 & NACOSTI/P/24/33297. This license confirms adherence to the regulations enabling drone footage of animals to be collected in their natural habitats. We followed a protocol that strictly complies with the guidelines set forth by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) No.1835F awarded to Princeton University. These guidelines are designed to ensure the ethical and humane treatment of animals involved in research activities. We flew at an altitude that did not disturb the baboons after calibrating this via several trial flights. We approached the animals from downwind, allowing drone noise to dissipate before reaching the animals. Finally, no humans can be distinguished in the videos.