Document is current
Any future updates will be listed below
-
Authors
González-Nuevo, Covadonga https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0501-8907
Cuesta, Marcelino https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1060-9536
Postigo, Álvaro https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4228-8965
Menéndez-Aller, Álvaro https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4049-5488
Muñiz, José https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2652-5361
-
Funding
Funding for this research was provided by:
Universidad de Oviedo
- License Information
-
More Information
Article History
Accepted: 11 November 2021
First Online: 2 December 2021
Declarations
: The study was not explicitly reviewed by an Ethics Committee, given that this is not required by our University of Oviedo, nor by the national guidelines established in the Code of Ethics of the Spanish Psychological Association. There are several reasons why an explicit approval by an Ethics Committee was not necessary: the participants evaluated were adults, the evaluation was voluntarily accepted, that is, an implicit informed consent is assumed, and the data is treated anonymously and confidentially. In addition, all the recommendations established in ISO-10667 Standard for the evaluation of people were strictly followed. The whole evaluation process and the use of the measuring instruments were carried out always following the Deontological Code of the Spanish Psychological Association (), as well as the International Test Commission Guidelines for Test Use ().
: Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.
: The authors declare no competing interests.
