Retraction Retraction dated 2023-11-09
Click to view Retraction: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-023-08499-4
-
Authors
Wang, Yanjiao https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0588-9120
Wang, Peijuan https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4454-7502
Wu, Qing https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9110-8361
Wang, Yao https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5265-9224
Lin, BingJun https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3141-2174
Long, Jia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9214-4930
Qing, Xiong https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7784-1778
Wang, Pei https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6309-2366
-
Funding
Funding for this research was provided by:
Major bidding projects for the National Social Sciences Fund of China ((17ZDA327)
- License Information
-
More Information
Article History
Received: 14 April 2022
Accepted: 6 September 2022
First Online: 17 October 2022
Change Date: 9 November 2023
Change Type: Correction
Change Details: This article has been retracted. Please see the Retraction Notice for more detail:
Change Details: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-023-08499-4
Declarations
:
: This study was approved by the local ethics committee of Shanghai Normal University (The IRB number is 18015SJD008) and was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (2013). All participants were informed before the investigation began.
: The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.
Free to read: This content has been made available to all.
