Dai, Huimin
Li, Rong
Su, Siyu
Cui, Yifan
Lin, Yueming
Zhang, Liang
Zhu, Xiaohong http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5772-8516
Funding for this research was provided by:
Department of Science and Technology of Sichuan Province (2017GZ0396)
Guizhou Science and Technology Department ([2020]2Y063-2020QT)
Article History
Received: 9 November 2021
Accepted: 27 December 2021
First Online: 11 January 2022
Conflict of interest
: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
: SEM images of PG-i (<i>i</i> = 1, 2, 3) (a–c), PG-5 (d), PCG-i (<i>i</i> = 1, 2, 3, 4) (e–h) and PCG-6 (i) (Fig. S1); SEM images of RGO (a), PANI (b) and MWCNT (c) (Fig. S2); XRD patterns of RGO, PANI, MWCNT, MCG, PG-4 and PCG-5 (Fig. S3); the high-resolution C 1s spectra, the high-resolution N 1s spectra, the high-resolution O 1s spectra and the high-resolution S 2p spectra of MCG (Fig. S4); N<sub>2</sub> adsorption-desorption isotherms (a–c), pore size distribution calculated by the DFT method (d) of RGO, PG-4 and PCG-5 (Fig. S5); MIP data analysis of RGO, PG-i (<i>i</i> = 1–5), MCG and PCG-i (<i>i</i> = 1–6) (Table SI); the fitted <i>R</i><sub><i>s</i></sub> and <i>R</i><sub><i>ct</i></sub> of PG-i (<i>i</i> =1–5), MCG and PCG-i (<i>i</i> =1–6) (Table SII).