Updates are available Erratum dated 2019-06-07
Click to view Erratum: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11856-019-1861-y
-
Authors
Bruin, Henk
Fokkink, Robbert
Kraaikamp, Cor
- License Information
-
More Information
Article History
Received: 17 April 2013
Revised: 17 June 2014
First Online: 3 November 2015
Change Date: 1 April 2019
Change Type: Erratum
Change Date: 7 June 2019
Change Type: Erratum
Change Details: In [1, Theorem 3] we claim that ��1 > 0 > ��2. However, we can only conclude that ��1 > ��2 from our proof, since we have no more information than what the theorem by Lagarias (which we use here) gives.
Change Details: In [1, Theorem 3] we claim that ��1 > 0 > ��2. However, we can only conclude that ��1 > ��2 from our proof, since we have no more information than what the theorem by Lagarias (which we use here) gives.
