Menéndez-Aller, Álvaro http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4049-5488
Cuesta, Marcelino http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1060-9536
Postigo, Álvaro http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4228-8965
González-Nuevo, Covadonga http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0501-8907
García-Fernández, Jaime http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7414-8807
García-Cueto, Eduardo http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1059-117X
Funding for this research was provided by:
Universidad de Oviedo
Article History
Accepted: 28 October 2021
First Online: 1 December 2021
Declarations
:
: The study was not explicitly reviewed by an Ethics Committee, given that this is not required by the University of Oviedo, nor by the national guidelines established in the Code of Ethics of the Spanish Psychological Association. There are several reasons why an explicit approval by an Ethics Committee was not necessary: the participants evaluated were adults, the evaluation was voluntarily accepted, that is, an implicit informed consent is assumed, and the data is treated anonymously and confidentially. In addition, all the recommendations established in ISO-10667 Standard for the evaluation of people were strictly followed.The whole evaluation process and the use of the measuring instruments were carried out always following the Deontological Code of the Spanish Psychological Association (2015), as well as the International Test Commission Guidelines for Test Use (2013).
: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.