Saeedi, Zoha http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9392-3634
Ghorbani, Nima
Shojaeddin, Arista
Sarafraz, Mahdi Reza
Article History
Accepted: 30 January 2022
First Online: 19 February 2022
Declarations
:
: The present study showed that there was no difference between the suppression induction and mindfulness induction groups in terms of reporting pain and distress in the seven stages of the experiment and follow-up. Even though there are differences in heart rate, respiration rate, and abdominal respiration amplitude between intervention groups in the clinic. Also, the suppression induction group appraised the massage experience as more painful and more unpleasant than the mindfulness induction group.The same report of pain and distress between the two groups could be due to the short-term therapeutic effects of suppression (Cowan et al., CitationRef removed), which is as effective as mindfulness induction in reducing pain and distress in patients. Cioffi and Holloway (CitationRef removed; Ryckeghem et al., CitationRef removed) revealed that suppressing pain-related thoughts is no different from other cognitive strategies that affect pain sensitivity in the short term but will lead to the formation of several long-term effects. The same result was found in the higher sensitivity suppression induction group during the experience of muscle massage in this study.Considering the differences in physical indices despite no difference in reporting pain and distress in the chronic pain patients, it seems perhaps patients with chronic pain as a group usually avoiding or inhibiting conflicting emotions (Raphael et al., CitationRef removed) may have repressed or suppressed their pain symptoms or feelings and did not report accurately their pain and distress in self-reports, while different scores on physical indices may have shown the actual difference in the experience of the two groups. In other words, although the differences in the self-report scales of the chronic pain patients were not significant, the physiological parameters measured differed between the two intervention groups. Thus, it seems that the interventions performed may have made a positive difference between the two groups, but patients with chronic pain did not report this difference in the self-report scales. This finding is consistent with the discrepancy that is often observed (Weinberger et al., CitationRef removed) between self-report anxiety and physiological and behavioral arousal in repressors (Myers et al., CitationRef removed). The simplest explanation of the discrepancies between the self-reports and the behavioral or physiological measures is that repressors experience high levels of anxiety but deny this in their self-reports. If this were the case, repressors’ levels of experienced anxiety would be consistent with their levels of behavioral and physiological anxiety (Derakshan & Eysenck, CitationRef removed as cited in Walsh et al., CitationRef removed).From many evolutionary/functional perspectives, the mental experience of emotion is not the main characteristic of emotion, but the biosensor information that determines changes in temperature, pressure, body posture, muscle tension, and movement (Levenson,CitationRef removed as cited in Levenson, CitationRef removed) And the highest correlation between subjective experience and physiology is seen in subjects with a deep experience of Vipassana meditation (with a deep focus on inner states) (Sze, Gyurak, Yuan, & Levenson, CitationRef removed as cited in Levenson, CitationRef removed). This consistency is very important in emotion theories and is associated with health and well-being (Levenson, CitationRef removed).However, the respiratory status in this study showed that those who received the suppression induction intervention took more superficial breaths during the intervention and the patients who received the mindfulness induction intervention had deeper and slower breathing; both groups were close to the baseline respiratory status after the intervention. Both groups showed an increased respiratory rate and decreased amplitude at the time of the muscle massage. This pattern indicates that the suppression induction disrupted the autonomic system's balance (activation of the sympathetic system of patients) and the mindfulness induction led to a better balance of the autonomic system (activation of the patients' parasympathetic system) in the cardiac and respiratory states. Besides, a similar pattern of breathing during the muscle massage task indicated that this stimulus was somewhat anxious for both groups and activated the sympathetic system in both groups. These findings are consistent with studies showing that mindfulness training can inhibit the sympathetic nervous system response to acute stress (Nyklíˇcek et al., CitationRef removed) and lead to increased parasympathetic nervous system activity (Ditto et al., CitationRef removed).Thayer and Lane (CitationRef removed as cited in Creswell & Lindsay, CitationRef removed) revealed that mindfulness can: 1) reduce sympathetic-nervous-system activation and its principle stress effectors (secretion of the catecholamines norepinephrine and epinephrine), or 2) lead to increased activity in the parasympathetic nervous system, which can slow-down the sympathetic-nervous-system fight-or-flight stress responses via the vagus nerve.The findings of this study also showed that the heart rate of the suppression induction group was higher than the heart rate of the mindfulness induction group. Indeed, suppression induction is one of the predictors of increased physiological response (Burns, CitationRef removed), and the suppression of emotion is associated with physiological indices such as increased heart rate and decreased skin conductance resistance (Myers et al., CitationRef removed) and increased risk of cardiovascular disease development through elevated cardiovascular reactions to both novel and recurrent stress (Howard et al. CitationRef removed).It seems that a brief intervention through the suppression of emotion and thought can disrupt the autonomic nervous system balance and activate the sympathetic nervous system in patients. Perhaps repressors who are chronic thought suppressors (Wegner & Zanakos, CitationRef removed) and habitually suppress awareness of these feelings will be subject to many physical illnesses. Repressors may not be aware of their physical states and symptoms (Schwartz, CitationRef removed), But the long-term consequence of this increased autonomic nervous system activity may increase risk of many health problems (Myers et al., CitationRef removed). However, repressors, despite their lower reports of health problems, usually indicate more autonomic nervous system abnormalities (Giese-Davis et al., CitationRef removed).Also, a brief intervention through mindful attention to emotion and thoughts can activate the parasympathetic nervous system of chronic pain patients, for whom avoidance and inhibition are characteristics (Raphael et al., CitationRef removed). Long term therapeutic mindfulness programs focusing on the characteristic of the repressive coping style (which can lead to more sympathetic nervous activity and more physical problems) can play an important role in improving the health of these individuals.Also, in the experience of muscle massage, when the patients suppressed the experience of physical pain and attempted to deliberately suppress their internal stimuli, in the first step, apparently they calmed themselves down by ignoring their internal stimuli, but in the next step, without wanting to devote part of their mind to spamming unwanted content, the availability of unfavorable thoughts increased under the “ironic process model” (Wegner and Zanakos, CitationRef removed). And paradoxically, sensitivity to pain increases over time through the unconscious monitoring system. This study, consistent with the study by Elfant et al. (CitationRef removed), has shown that participants in the suppression induction group were generally less responsive than the other group during the recovery and massage periods. Conversely, when a chronic pain patient tried to eagerly observe and accept their pain, emotions, feelings, and thoughts during the pain experience—without the tendency to change or control internal stimuli and allowing them to be processed—they could also try to experience this new physical stimulation and whatever was going on from moment to moment when they received the muscle massage, rather than relying on previous experiences of pain or fear of physical stimulation.Studies have shown that meditation training, such as mindfulness-based stress reduction, can reduce pain symptoms and increase psychological well-being. (McCracken et al., CitationRef removed) and in the case of laboratory-induced pain, short-term meditation interventions lead to greater tolerance, less pain, and distress compared to control groups (Zeidan et al., CitationRef removed). Also, drawing attention to painful stimuli, in particular to their objective / sensory dimensions, can lead to less pain perception (Gard et al., CitationRef removed). Also, suppression and repression of experience are associated with activation of the sympathetic nervous system and increase the possibility of experiencing pain and physical sensitivity, while mindfulness is associated with the activation of the parasympathetic system and greater experience of pleasant emotions.Studies have shown characteristic traits could moderate the effectiveness of experimental interventions on pain (Elfant et al., CitationRef removed). The importance of this study was showing the role of suppression and mindfulness induction on the experience of pain with controlling the trait of repressive coping style and mindfulness. In other words, this study has attended characteristic individual differences, while assessing the effectiveness of interventions on pain.It seems overall relief from pain is an unrealistic goal. Therapists should focus on improving the pain-related distress and patients functioning. Pain-management protocols can avoid chronic pain through accepting and moment-to-moment attention to any pain. By activating the parasympathetic system in pain patients and breaking the vicious circle of pain suppression, they can take a fundamental step in reducing the distress and pain sensitivity caused by pain. Therefore, it can prevent and decrease the possible formation of chronic pain.This study had some limitations; it was not possible to screen repressor patients from a large sample. Then to control the repressive coping style, we had to statistically control for this personality trait. And in the follow-up phase, it was not possible to measure physiological indices, and the follow-up data were limited to patients' self-reports. Similar further studies should be carried out with other samples to evaluate the effectiveness of mid-term and long-term mindfulness training, taking into account a repressive coping style, in the psychological and physical experience of pain. Also, a comparison of the efficacy of mindfulness-based interventions on repressor and non-repressor pain patients is another suggestion. Besides, it is suggested that to increase the generalizability of the results, similar studies should be conducted with other samples with different demographic characteristics.<i>The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. All co-authors have seen and agree with the contents of the manuscript and there is no financial interest to report. We certify that the submission is original work and is not under review at any other publication. Approval was obtained from the University of Tehran ethics committee and the informed consent was written by participants. Also, datasets are available.</i>