Webber, Troy A.
Bailey, K. Chase
Alverson, W. Alexander
Critchfield, Edan A.
Bain, Kathleen M.
Messerly, Johanna M.
O’Rourke, Justin J. F.
Kirton, Joshua W.
Fullen, Chrystal
Marceaux, Janice C.
Soble, Jason R.
Article History
Received: 7 August 2018
Accepted: 23 October 2018
First Online: 3 November 2018
Change Date: 27 November 2018
Change Type: Correction
Change Date: 27 November 2018
Change Type: Correction
Change Details: Correction of mistake in the original version of this paper, “Further Validation of the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM) Trial 1 Performance Validity Index: Examination of False Positives and Convergent Validity”, the sentence “As indicated in Table 7, TOMM T1 ≤ 40 exhibited sensitivity of .86.
Change Details: Correction of mistake in the original version of this paper, ���Further Validation of the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM) Trial 1 Performance Validity Index: Examination of False Positives and Convergent Validity���, the sentence ���As indicated in Table 7, TOMM T1���������40 exhibited sensitivity of .86.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
:
: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
: This study was IRB approved.
: All participants provided informed consent.The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or the official policy of the Department of Veterans Affairs or U.S. Government.