Document is current
Any future updates will be listed below
-
Authors
Whitaker, Kelly
Fortier, Alexandra
Bruns, Eric J.
Nicodimos, Semret
Ludwig, Kristy
Lyon, Aaron R.
Pullmann, Michael D.
Short, Kathy
McCauley, Elizabeth
-
Funding
Funding for this research was provided by:
Institute for Educational Sciences (R305A120128)
- License Information
-
More Information
Article History
First Online: 6 March 2018
Compliance with Ethical Standards
:
: Authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
: All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional review board (IRB) of the University of Washington and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
: Informed consent for the Washington cohort was obtained for all participants, given these data were collected under the auspice of a federal research study. Data collection for the Ontario cohort was not deemed subject of formal IRB review because it was a quality improvement evaluation of the BRISC intervention in which (1) data were recorded by the investigator in such a manner that participants could not be identified, directly or through identifiers linked to the subjects, and (2) data were collected primarily for the purpose of evaluating public benefit and identifying possible changes in or alternatives to the program.
